| Page 1 | (Paris Agreements of 1973) |  |  |
CHAPTER 1 PARIS AGREEMENTS OF 1973 NORTH VIETNAMESE
AND PRG EXPECTATIONS
In March of 1972, the North Vietnamese, along
with the Vietcong, launched a powerful conventional offensive. The Communist
leaders hoped it would knock the U.S. out of the war altogether, or at least
might force the Nixon Administration to make further concessions in the
long-stalled peace talks. North Vietnam's Lieutenant General Tran Van Tra,
deputy commander of the Communist forces in the South, stated a year after the
1972 'Easter' offensive that 'The aim of the 1972 offensive was to force the
U.S. to sign a peace agreement.'1 However, the offensive was a
total disaster for the North Vietnamese and the Communist leaders were far from
pleased with the results. Despite their investment of 120,000 North Vietnamese
regular troops and thousands of Vietcong guerrillas equipped with Soviet
artillery, rockets, and tanks, they failed to smash the South Vietnamese Army.2
Instead of driving the United States out of the war, the U.S. increased its
actions and proceeded to step up the bombing of North Vietnam. In the end, U.S.
air interdiction in the North and airlift and close air support in the South,
especially during the battles of An Loc and Kontum, gave the South Vietnamese
forces a distinct advantage over the Communist forces in 1972.3 Although the Communist forces
made substantial gains in the rich and populous Mekong Delta, they failed to
beat the U.S. and South Vietnamese forces as they had beaten the French at Dien
Bien Phu in 1954. Without this type of psychological knockout, they were in no
position to dictate peace terms.4 However,
despite the staggering cost in human life of nearly 50,000 dead, and at least as
many wounded, the 1972 offensive cracked the optimistic illusion of
Vietnamization. To succeed on the battlefield, the South Vietnamese had to
resort to the enormous reliance on U.S. air support and advisors. Thus, the 1972
offensive laid the groundwork for an eventual political deal and an ultimately
successful future offensive in l975.5 After the failure of the 'Easter'
offensive to defeat the U.S. and South Vietnam, the North Vietnamese decided on
a compromise to break the deadlock in the peace negotiations; they would also
use the 1972 Presidential Election to put pressure on U.S. negotiators--a period
during which they felt that the pressure would be strongest for the U.S. to
conclude negotiations at any price. In order to achieve a settlement, the North
Vietnamese now considered offering a major concession: dropping their demand
that South Vietnam's President Thieu must be removed before the fighting could
stop (a demand that they had been making since the beginning of peace talks in
1969).6 By making this concession, the North Vietnamese leaders would succeed in
getting the U.S. to leave South Vietnam and allow them to continue their
struggle at a more favorable future date. However, in typical Communist
fashion, North Vietnam and the PRG, through the Giai Phong (Liberation) Press
Agency, again pressed for his removal after Thieu refused to sign the accords
agreed to in October 1972 by Henry Kissinger and North Vietnamese Foreign
Minister Le Duc Tho.7 The October draft of the accords called for an in-place
cease-fire. Under this 'leopard spot' arrangement, the South Vietnamese and the
Vietcong would hold the areas they controlled at the time of the cease-fire,
pending a final settlement.8 It would also allow the North Vietnamese to leave
an estimated 160,000 regular NVA troops in the South-- a key issue in North
Vietnam's future bid for power and control of South Vietnam.9 However, President Thieu of
South Vietnam refused to sign this agreement which allowed North Vietnamese
troops to remain in the South. He also gave Kissinger a list of 96 proposals to
be made before he would sign the agreement.10 When Kissinger proposed these
additional changes to Le Duc Tho, the North Vietnamese interpreted them as a
'breach of faith' and demanded that the October draft be signed in its original
form without changes. A deadlock ensued and talks between Kissinger and Le Duc
Tho stalled in December 1972.
| Page 1 | (Paris Agreements of 1973) |  |  |
|