APPENDIX B: INTERVIEW WITH MELVIN R. LAIRD
(Secretary of
Defense 1969-1973)
1. Question: Did the Son Tay Raid indicate a change in the
political decision process?
Answer: Yes. Nixon's policy of
withdrawal through negotiations would be pursued by military action if those
negotiations did not produce the desired results. Nixon had done this with the
bombings in Cambodia and would continue this type of 'strongman' tactic
throughout his Presidency.
2. Question: Could the American public
have supported a new war against Hanoi with the POW/MIA issue as the focal
point?
Answer: Yes. I was the first to bring
the issue to the full attention of the American public. We had been receiving
information about the harsh treatment and in many cases, POWs dying in
captivity. During 1969, three POWs were released which highlighted my concerns
so I began to take action. Many in Congress and in the Administration disagreed
with me because they did not want Hanoi to make a public issue out of the
situation if pushed, since they believed Hanoi had the upper hand in this issue,
thus putting the U.S. in a position to be dictated to in public. As it turned
out, that is exactly what Hanoi did and that is part of the reason why I and the
Administration went to Son Tay. We knew we had to do something.
3. Question: Was the Raid a 'Win-Win'
situation for the President?
Answer: Yes. No POWs were killed and
the raid force performed superbly through out the mission. If POWs had been at
the camp we would have gotten them out. As it was, no POWs were there but the
effects the raid had on the enemy were noticed almost immediately afterwards. Do
you understand? The President followed through on his policy and the actual raid
was a success. Do you understand? How could anyone not call it a success?
4. Question: How did the Raid affect
future rescue operations?
Answer: Did you read Schemmer's book?
We had discussed and even did some planning for another raid and you can bet
this time we would bring POWs out. However, due to Son Tay, the POW/MIA issue
began to move as real progress was seen at the political level and it was
reflected in the overall peace talks. As a result of this progress, the idea of
another raid gradually faded, after all, two years later most of the POWs had
been released.
APPENDIX B: INTERVIEW WITH MELVIN R.
LAIRD (CONT.)
(Secretary of Defense 1969-1973)
5. Question: What message if any, did
China and Russia receive as a result of the Raid?
Answer: The message was for Hanoi only.
However, if China or Russia could bring pressure to bear on Hanoi in regards to
the POW/MIA issue, that was okay too.
6. Question: Did you know at anytime
prior to the Raid that no POWs were at Son Tay?
Answer: No. All the intelligence we had
indicated that POWs were at the camp. I had been involved in this intelligence
collection for quite some time and I had seen several other camps which we had
been looking at for a long time. Son Tay gave no indication that POWs were not
there. We knew the camp was active and had been for several years. The decision
to execute was based on this intelligence. However, we knew that there was a
possibility that no POWs were there. After all, we had no hard evidence of their
presence, only indications from camps known to house POWs that were similar to
the conditions and activity found at Son Tay. The raid force knew of this
possibility also. Do you understand? I know what you are asking. The Hanoi
information was simply not believable.
7. Question: Did you brief the
President on the Hanoi source information?
Answer: No. The decision to go had
already been made. Do you understand? I believed the information to be
inaccurate. I informed the President about new information concerning the deaths
of additional POWs being held. The CIA passed that as many as 10 more POWs had
died in captivity.
Additional Comments: Mr. Laird was very
polite during correspondence prior to and during the interview. This author was
honored by Mr. Laird's attention, concern, and thoughtfulness on this issue. Mr.
Laird also said that he had personal files concerning the raid and the period
while he was Secretary of Defense that would not be released until a future
date.
This interview was conducted over the
telephone on 17 December 1996. The interview lasted approximately 45 minutes.
The answers provided by Mr. Laird are summations of the questions asked. The
answers are not exact quotes. Rather, they were reconstructed from notes taken
during the interview and at the best recollection of this author.