CHAPTER 7
Pacification 1970:
Plans, Organization, and Problems
Pacification; The
Nationwide Perspective-The 1970 GVN Pacification and Development Plan
Pacification Plans and Organization in Military Region I-Pacification Situation
in Quang Nam, Early 1970
Pacification; The
Nationwide Perspective
In 1957, a French officer, summing up
the lessons of his country's defeat in Indochina, wrote of warfare against
guerrillas:
The destruction of rebel forces is not
an end in itself: we know that as long as the enemy's infrastructure remains in
place, he is able to maintain his control over the people and can replenish his
decimated forces. Military operations are therefore only worthwhile insofar as
they facilitate winning the people and contribute to the dismantling of the
revolutionary politico-military organization . . . .'
This lesson, which the French had
learned painfully in the 1950s, the Americans and their South Vietnamese
allies had relearned, equally painfully, in the 1960s. By early 1970,
'pacification,' long a major concern of the Marines in Vietnam, had become
the center of country-wide allied strategy. In theory and to an increasing
extent in practice, all allied military operations, from battalion-size
sweeps of enemy base areas to squad ambushes on the outskirts of hamlets, were
conducted in support of pacification. Increasingly, too, allied forces engaged
in a variety of paramilitary and nonmilitary pacification activities.
Definitions of 'pacification' varied
with time and with the agency using the word. The III MAP/ICTZ Combined Campaign
Plan for 1970 defined pacification as:
The military, political, economic, and
social process of establishing or re-establishing local government
responsive to and involving the participation of the people. It includes the
provision of sustained, credible territorial security, the destruction of the
enemy's underground government, the assertion or re-assertion of political
control and involvement of the people in government, and the initiation of
economic and social activity capable of self-sustenance and expansion
. . . 2
After years of confusion about goals and
policies, resulting m divided authority and fragmented administration, the
Americans and South Vietnamese had developed and were implementing a
comprehensive pacification strategy. This strategy involved, first,
the use of regular military units to clear the NVA and VC main forces and most
of the guerrillas from the populated rural areas. The regular forces then were
to keep the enemy out by a combination of small-unit patrolling, ambushing, and
larger sweeps of base areas. Within the screen thus established, Regional and
Popular Forces and paramilitary forces and civilian agencies of the Republic of
Vietnam would attempt to destroy the enemy political organization among the
people, reestablish government control in each village and hamlet, and, it was
hoped, win the allegiance of the people through economic and social
improvements.
In the GVN's Accelerated Pacification
Campaign, proclaimed in October 1968 by President Nguyen Van Thieu, the allies
broke down these general concepts of pacification into specific tasks and
assigned responsibility for each task to particular civil or military
agencies. The plan set goals to be met for each task at national, corps,
and province levels. Expanding upon the 1968 plan, the GVN Pacification and
Development Plan for 1969 continued and refined the definition of tasks and
assignment of goals and provided the framework for a nationwide effort.
By early 1970, both the United States
and South Vietnam had achieved substantial central control over the many
civilian and military agencies involved in pacification. For the Americans, the
U.S. Civil Operations and Revolutionary Development Support (CORDS), formed
in mid-1967, combined most of the personnel engaged in pacification and in
advising GVN nonmilitary agencies into one chain of command under MACV. The
CORDS organization paralleled the military and political structure of the South
Vietnamese Government, with a deputy for CORDS under each U.S. corps
area commander and lower-ranking CORDS deputies at province and district
headquarters. In Saigon, the national head of CORDS in 1970, Ambassador
William Colby, was a member of General Abrams's staff. On the South Vietnamese
side, a Central Pacification and Development Council (CPDC)* chaired by the
Prime Minister and including represen-
* The CPDC was defined in the 1970
Combined Campaign Plan as the 'ministerial council at the cabinet level
responsible for planning, coordinating and executing the national
Pacification and Development Program.'