|
|
Woodrow Wilson |
 |
Thomas
Woodrow Wilson was born in 1856 in Staunton, Virginia, moved to Augusta, Georgia at a very
young age, and grew up in the deep South during the Civil War and Reconstruction. His
father was a Presbyterian minister and his mother was the daughter of a Presbyterian
minister, an upbringing which helps to explain the degree to which Wilson viewed public
service as a question of moral right and wrong. Before entering public life in 1910,
Wilson was a successful scholar, educator, and college president, making him one of the
few formal intellectuals ever to seek the Presidency. This combination of high moral
purpose and high-minded abstraction characterizes much of Wilsons career. Lofty and
spellbinding in front of a crowd, he frequently struck personal acquaintances as
disconnected and aloof; eloquent in his affinity for Humanity and the People in the
abstract, his rapport with actual individuals was often less accomplished. |
| Wilson was educated at Princeton, the most Southerner-friendly of the major Eastern
colleges, where he became a skilled debater and envisioned for himself a career in
politics. After law school at the University of Virginia and a brief and
unprofitable stint as a lawyer in Atlanta, however, Wilson turned to college teaching. He
earned a Ph.D. from Johns Hopkins in 1886 and taught history at Bryn Mawr and Wesleyan
before landing back at Princeton in 1890 as Professor of Jurisprudence and Political
Economy. His Hopkins thesis and best-known intellectual work, Congressional Government (1885), compared the American system of government unfavorably to a British-style
parliamentary system, which Wilson considered more efficient and more accountable for its
actions than slow, unwieldy American federalism. Congressional Government also
attacked the American Presidency as a relatively weak and ineffectual institution and
bemoaned the inability of the American political system to attract talented men to public
service. (Link to excerpts.) By 1902, when he was elected president of Princeton, Wilson
was considered one of the nations top scholars of American history and government. |
 |
|
| As president of Princeton, Wilson presided over the development of the college into a
university, and fought to substitute
scholarship for social status as the measure of success in college life. His results were
mixed. He presided successfully over the re-organization of the Princeton curriculum into
a preceptorial system that blended old-fashioned, regimented collegiate learning with the
elective system increasingly prevalent at other colleges. His plan to substitute a
quadrangle system of undergraduate housing for Princetons age-old and exclusionary
eating clubs, however, failed ignominiously, as did an attempt to force integration of the
new graduate school facilities into the center of campus life. During the course of these
battles with alumni and trustees, Wilson at several key times rejected proffered
compromise in favor of fighting for what he considered the essential principles of his
program with exhortative, moralistic, and ultimately doomed rhetoric (Link here to primary
sources). At odds with many of the trustees and about to enter New Jersey politics, he
resigned as Princeton president in 1910. |
 |
|
|
In 1910 Wilson was approached by a coalition of the political machines then in control
of the New Jersey Democratic Party to run for Governor. The machine politicians imagined
they were getting a pliable conservative who would lend them prestige and rhetoric and
leave their essential business including their control over the party alone.
Until 1910, everything in Wilsons professional and political history suggested that
this might indeed be the case, for Wilson up until this point was a more or less orthodox
conservative Democrat. Wilson had attacked William Jennings Bryan as a dangerous radical
as late as 1907 and throughout his career had been generally contemptuous of Populism as
well as of much of the developing program of twentieth-century reform. (Links to
conservative speeches) He also explicitly promised party leaders he had no interest in
smashing their organizations. During the campaign, however, Wilson became convinced of the
moral rectitude of the reform program; once in office he pursued it without regard for
and to some degree without recognition of the fact that it undercut the
interests of those who put him there. He began by denying Jim Smith, the most powerful of
his machine supporters, a seat in the Senate, and spent the next two years fighting for
and achieving workmens compensation legislation, regulation of utilities, electoral
reform, and other elements of the reform program. (Link to NJ Gov inaugural speech) Many
of these were things Wilson had denounced a few years before. He had become convinced of
their justice, however, and once Wilson was so convinced he considered his only remaining
job to convince others of the morality of his stance. The reform program was correct, it
was morally upright, and, as at Princeton, Wilson fought for it. He found himself
instantly a darling of the reform wing of the Democratic Party.
Even before Wilsons stunning success as New Jersey governor and his late
conversion to reform, certain portions of the Democratic Party considered Wilson
Presidential material; by 1912 the Wilson for President movement had already been underway
several years, led in part by George Harvey, influential publisher of Harpers
Weekly, and Joseph Pulitzer of the New York World. For a Democratic Party
divided between conservative Northern Democrats, Western Bryanites, and the Solid South,
Wilson was an attractive national candidate, even more so as a reformer who was not
three-time Presidential loser William Jennings Bryan. Wilson was, depending on how one
looked at it, both Northerner and Southerner, conservative and reformer, Establishment
member and political outsider. In addition, he had more powerful
rhetorical skills than any nationally prominent Democrat save Bryan. He entered the
1912 campaign a front-runner for the Democratic nomination despite only two years of
political experience. |
Marc Horger was the author of this text. |
|
|