THE strike at Lawrence, which appeared from a surface view to he like many others, is
worthy of more careful attention because it marks the entrance into the East of a new
element and a new method in labor disputes. The Industrial Workers of the World promoted
it and their aim is not merely to increase wages and to secure better conditions but to
own the industries themselves. They hope to gain control of the industries by striking for
increases in wages time after time until they get all the profit there is in the business
and have thus wrested it from the control of capital. There are no conditions of work or
wages which satisfy them so long as employers exist. Their plan is to work when necessity
forces them to, merely as a temporary truce.
The thing which the American Federation of Labor works for--that is, agreements with
employers--is directly contrary to the method of the Industrial Workers of the World. As a
body the " I. W. W." is irreconcilable. It refuses to enter into any agreements.
It will sign nothing which does not leave its members free to quit work whenever they like
or under any conditions.
The Industrial Workers of the World is not a labor union like the unions of the
American Federation of Labor. It is a union of socialists and its whole aim is
socialism--that is, the control of the instruments of production by the labor classes. Its
propaganda is as contrary to that of the Federation of Labor as it is to the interests of
the employers; and this explains the hostility to the Lawrence strike that has been shown
by President Gompers, and by such union leaders as John Golden of the National Textile
Workers. The demand of the strikers in Lawrence was for certain specific increases in
wages, but the motive behind it was to begin a campaign for the ownership of the machinery
of production by the Industrial Workers of the World. Whatever were the conditions in
Lawrence, therefore, they were not entirely the cause of the strike. "The
battle-field," as William D. Haywood, a moving spirit of the Industrial Workers,
called it, might have been selected at almost any other place with equal justification, so
far as its propaganda is concerned.
The specific cause of the strike was an act of the Massachusetts legislature which
lowered the legal hours of work for women and children from 56 to 54 hours a week. When
this law went into effect, the operatives were notified that as the hours had been reduced
two hours a week their wages would be correspondingly reduced. The operatives, who
included a large number of non-English speaking people, had assumed that the act of the
legislature had raised their rate of pay, and on receiving notice to the contrary struck.
There has been a good deal of loose talk about the low rate of wages in Lawrence, and- the
Tariff Board's report indicates that the average wage is not high. On the other hand, the
foreign operatives in Lawrence have been in the habit of sending about $700,000 yearly to
European relations and the savings banks, of that city have deposits of nearly
$21,000,000.
But these aspects of the Lawrence strike are not the most important. The main point is
that a new, irreconcilable, and militant organization has come among the workers in the
East. Its success at Lawrence may be a prophecy of similar strikes elsewhere.
Source:The World's Work 24(May 1912): 13-14 |